independents, should all watch jesse watters on fox news. tells the facts, and has great hair. who picked the texts today? a maryland one. jesse, i went back and forth a while, but bill has better hair than you. i'm sorry. i think the southern heat improves the volume. my excuse. tucker is next. i'm watters. this is my world. >> tucker: good evening. welcome to "tucker carlson." so much is going on, that it's often easy to lose track of the things that matter, the things that define history in the lives of our children and grandchildren. but joe biden's now famous blood red speech of september 1st certainly qualifies as one of the big things. in that speech, biden announced that not only is his program the best for this country, that's

conventional, he said going forward his program is the only program allowed in this country. competing programs are not allowed anymore. they're illegitimate, they're dangerous, a threat to the republic itself. joe biden declared that his political opponents are enemies of the state, terrorists, in fact, comparable to al qaeda on 9/11. now biden and harris said this. they didn't say it in private, grousing bidderly to aides in the oval office, they said it in public on television, and didn't flinch as they did. so you have to think about the implications of this. the united states is a two-party political system. has for our whole lifetime. if the leader of one party, who happens to be the president, redefines the other party, not as a political party, but as criminal organization, what is he doing? of course he's demanding a one-party state. that's what biden is doing.

he's using federal law enforcement to make it happen. so the question is, how is he getting away with it? he's getting away with it by changing the term. can't just openly say i want a one-party state with me at the head. no. you have to make the other side unacceptable. he doesn't talk about voters or americans, you describes an insurgency, an armed rebellion. trump voters, biden tells us, aren't just wrong, they tried to overthrow the u.s. government. you can't debate people like that. you have to crush that. democrats appear to believe this. tim ryan, running for the senate as a democrat from ohio, just yesterday, told "morning joe" on msnbc, quote, we've got to kill and confront that movement. not defeat it. kill it. that's how dangerous populist republicans are according to the biden white house. this is the language of

totallianism. it's very obvious. people in power would push back against it. any responsible person would say, you can't do that. that's too much power. we can't vest all the power in one political party. that's the road to something awful. no one is pushing back. in fact, daily the media reinforces the message. daily the media remind us that anyone who has questions about the outcome of the last election isn't a disgruntled voter. that person is a criminal. that person has embraced the big lie. you see it in every big news story, the big lie. people like that irrational and punished, and they are being punished. yesterday afternoon fbi apprehended a man named mike lindell in minnesota and seized his phone. he's not a wanted criminal, not even a public official. mike lindell sells pillows, especially on this channel. why would the armed fbi agents

being apprehended mike lindell? because he questioned the outcome of the last election, questioned the big lie, a threat to the system. that's the consensus view in washington now. this is a very big change. in a free society, by definition, all questions are allowed. you can't have a democracy unless you're allowed to discuss its mechanics. free speech is a prerequisite for a democratic system. obviously. and until very recently everyone in america unquestioningly understood that. dissent was not a crime. it was a patriotic act. people commit it, at scale, especially democrats. for years after the 2000 election, democrats claimed that george w. bush was not the legitimate president. some still say it. they may believe it. then the entire democratic party rejected the outcome of the presidential election. a foreign power got donald trump

elected. democrats said that. they continue to say it every single day of donald trump's term. they impeached him over it. hamstrung the u.s. government which in the end turned up nothing. you would call that the big lie. but no one was punished for it. no judge removed adam schiff from office for doubting the election results. the fbi didn't rein cnn's biggest advertisers. everyone moved on. you may have hated the russia hoax. we certainly did. but there was never any question that all american citizens have an absolute constitutionally protected right to question election outcomes. by the way, you are even allowed, maybe even encouraged, to question the mechanics of voting. why wouldn't you question them? voting is the means by which huge amounts of money and power are transferred from one party to another. there's a lot at stake at the richest, most powerful country in the world.

so of course americans have an absolute right to see proof, not suggestions, but proof that the system is on the level. when they are denied that right, maybe it's a sign the system isn't on the level. once again, that used to be obvious. certainly obvious to democrats. here's a clip you may have not have seen before. this is the current vice president of the united states, kamala harris, speaking not so long ago, june 2018, about the integrity of electronic voting machines. kamala harris was a senator then. watch this. >> we recently actually -- i actually held a demonstration for my colleagues at the capitol, who we brought in folks who before our eyes hacked election machines, those that are being used in many states, but not state of the art from our perspective. >> tucker: kamala harris raising questions about the integrity of voting machines. you know what didn't happen next?

the fbi didn't trap kamala harris at a hardees to seize her cellphone. no one in the media calls her an insurrectionist. why would they? if you actually called about democracy, the trust in the system that's a prerequisite for democracy, you would encourage all questions from u.s. citizens about how your democracy was administered. you had never censor those questions, punish the people who asked those questions. ever. even news organizations once understood this. not so long ago. during the trump years, cnn published a video called "we watched hackers break into voting machines." oh, that was allowed then. cbs ran a report entitled "how electronic voting machines could hack your vote." oh, really? did the fbi come after you at hardees? no, they didn't. that's what news organizations used to do. if there's corruption, we'll sniff it out. we're going to reassure you that

your vote counts. you have to be reassured. you can't ban people from twitter and arrest them. once again, even democrats understood that. in 2019, a couple of them. elizabeth warren, mark warner of virginia, wrote to the makers of election systems, complaining about potential security vulnerabilities. quote, there has been a lack of meaningful innovation in the election vendor industry and our democracy is paying the price, end quote. is that true? honestly, we have no idea. we're not endorsing that view. then or now. we're merely saying it is not a crime to ask. in fact, it is a prerequisite, if you want to have a healthy system, that people are allowed to ask, the people who are asked, are required to show proof to reassure them. of course. but now democrats and the media who serve them are pretending that no one ever asks questions like this until 2020. ever. never happened before.

watch. >> this is a nation that believes in the rule of law. we do not repudiate it. this is a nation that respects free and fair elections. we honor the will of the people. we do not deny it. [cheers and applause] >> tucker: oh, the rule of law. so the rule of law, the new law, is shut up. right. they were telling you it was a, quote, free and fair election, about which no debate was allowed the day joe biden was certified the winner. the day. right. before they could know, in other words. so that's joe biden's new position. here's the same, we checked it, this is the same joe biden, a little dimmer, but still the same guy today, back in 2019. >> he's an illegitimate president in my mind. that's it. he's illegitimate. my biggest fear is he's going to do again with the help of vlad

his best pal, and we'll be stuck for six more years with this guy. it's terrifying. >> would you be my vice president? folks, look, i absolutely agree. >> tucker: oh, faced with an election denier who violates the rule of law and our sacred norms, in public, on camera. joe biden doesn't scold her, call for the fbi to trap her at hardees and seize her personal communications device. he jokingly offers to reward her. we're so on the same page we could run together. he didn't run with that election denier. he ran with this one. >> elections matter. when you win an election, you get to set the rules. >> how can you win with russian interference, though? i think he's an illegitimate president that didn't really win. how do you fight against that in 2020? >> absolutely right. again, as a member of the senate

intelligence community, we will believe that the russia did interfere in the election of the president of the united states in 2016. >> tucker: that clip is from three years ago. this is how conversation the conversation we're having is right now. no one seems to remember that. it was just sunday, it's wednesday, this sunday, like three days ago, that that same person, kamala harris, did a taped interview with nbc news and chuck todd, to explain that republicans who have the same questions about the last election that she had about the election before that should not be allowed to hold office, it's a threat to the republican, they're running for office. in other words, democracy is a threat to democracy. this is the currency of the democratic party, and has been for years. lose the election. immediately question the election. stacy abrams, anyone? we can show you dozens and dozens of clips of this. from kamala harris, from hillary clinton, from jean-pierre.

you get the point. this is crazy. but under joe biden the department of justice appears to be doing everything it can to criminalize questions about the last election. complain about election fraud, the fbi might show up. the doj's much broader effort, their effort is based on what they claim was a scheme to install alternate electors who would vote for donald trump in 2020 instead of joe biden. this is the core of their case. this is doj's apparent justification for crushing citizens and crushing dissent, seizing the cellphones of trump allies, including his personal attorney, which was never allowed, but they just did it. as cnn reportedly reported, the doj is investigating donald trump's, quote, fraudulent electors plot. that sounds bad. that sounds like a threat to democracy. what exactly is a fraudulent

elector? turns out that what cnn is telling you is a fraudulent elector is an alternate elector, not a new phenomenon. they've been around for generation. on election night in 1960, for example, richard nixon was running against jack kennedy. the state of hawaii appeared to be going narrowly for nixon, and they sent alternate electors to congress. they met in secret. after a recount determined that kennedy had won the state, kennedy's electors sent a third set of certificates. that's the set that the governor of hawaii ultimately certified and john kennedy became president. the question is, were kennedy's alternate electors raided by the feds at hardees even though their candidate was losing? were their communication

subpoenaed? no. in fact a state judge endorsed what the kennedy electors had done. he said by turning an alternative election certificate, even when losing in the vote count, kennedy's electors, all democrats, that's how the system works. after the 2020 election, trump electors in numerous states used virtually the same language as kennedy's hawaii electors had used in 1960, but this time these were not alternate electors, they were criminals. this is part of a criminal plot to overthrow the u.s. government, insurrectionists, trying to interfere with the real electors. as of five years ago, interfering with the work of real electors, it was your patriotic duty. remember this?

nobody remembers anything. we have google on this show. we recall as politico reported at the time, after donald trump's win in 2016, democratic electors were, quote, lobbying their republican counterparts in other states to reject their oaths, and in some cases state law, to vote against trump. democrats embraced this effort at the time. they even voted -- and again this wasn't in the 1860s. this was, like, 20 minutes ago. they voted to reject trump's electors. watch. >> i have an objection, because 10 of the 29 electoral votes cast by florida were cast by electors not lawfully certified because they violated florida's hicks against dual office -- >> out of order. >> mr. president, i object to the certificate from the state of georgia on the grounds that the -- >> no debate, no debate. >> mr. president, i object. >> under section 1517 -- >> i object to the massive voter

suppression. >> debate is not in order. debate is not in order. the gentlewoman will suspend. >> mr. president, i object, because people are horrified by the overwhelming evidence of russian interference in our elections. >> the united states code prohibits debate in the joint session. >> tucker: to be clear, we're not endorsing that. we weren't for it at the time. we probably mocked it as it happened. you can pull the tape. it's on the internet. but that was not an insurrection. that was not an insurrection, period. that was not an attempt to overthrow the u.s. government. neither was january 6th. anyone who says otherwise is a liar, with motives that that person doesn't care to describe out loud, because they're dark motives. if you're going to have a functioning country, a free society, a democracy, you have to have equal justice under the law. in that case, no democrat had his or home raided by the fbi

for doing this. none of them were removed from elected office by judges. it's too much. and they're so aggressive about it, and the threat of federal law enforcement is so omni pleasant, the few that are speaking out are a threat to the people in charge. not simply because they're trying to relitigate the last election. that's over. but because they're brave enough to say what they think. that's the point. they're brave enough to stand up for their constitutional right. kerry lake makes a good point in this clip. watch. >> i don't see how asking questions about an election where there were problems is dividing a country. what i do see dividing a country is shutting people down, censoring people, canceling people, trying to destroy people's lives when they do ask

questions. >> tucker: yeah. exactly. it's about free speech. at this point we may never know, and certainly partisan on both sides will probably never know till their full satisfaction all the details from the last election. what matters now is that we preserve the basic freedom in this country, the freedom of speech. in that clip, kari lake was referring to an election with record numbers of mail-in ballots, with lax security requirements. yesterday joe biden wanted to vote in his home state of delaware. de vote for mail? no. he used hundreds of thousands of dollars in public money to fly air force one to delaware to vote in person. so apparently joe biden doesn't trust mail-in voting. why would he? why would any of us be satisfied with the fact that democratic

partisan mark zuckerberg spent nearly a half a billion dollars to control voting. why wouldn't we have questions about that? including honest democrats. well, we would. in my opinion that cares about this country would have questions, because asking questions is not a crime, it's a duty. kari lake joins us now. i appreciate your coming on. you've made, i think, the clearest -- leaving aside whatever anyone thinks about the last election, you made the clearest defense of free speech that i've seen this year. >> it's simple. we go back to the u.s. constitution. i spent 30 years as a journalist. the first amendment is darn important, and they seem to be taking that away from us right now. you described the left's hypocrisy. you described the old saying, when they've lost the debate, they resort to lander. that's what we're seeing right

now. >> tucker: well, exactly. i'm not in arizona, but i've sort of been following your campaign. i think you have a provocative and true things to say about immigration, but those aren't covered because you're a big lie adherent. do you believe the media uses that slur to make certain people won't hear what you're saying about the issues? >> oh, for sure. if they aren't bad-mouthing, running hit pieces on me, they'll have to talk about the issues. when you look at our policies, our america first, arizona first policies, once they start covering that, it's game over, we win in a landslide, and then they're stuck with me for eight years. i think i'm a nightmare for the liberal media in arizona. >> tucker: so your opponent -- this may have changed by airtime tonight, but last time i checked your opponent was refusing to debate you, citing abc news and cnn, saying she's crazy. can she get away with that? >> she seems to be getting away

with it. she's raked over the coals by the mainstream media. it tells you how little her staff and her supporters think about her. they would rather her get just trashed right now in the media than show up for a debate, because they know that she has no policy to stand on. she's got a terrible back -- i mean, if you look back at when she was a legis legislator, shed against a border wall, against funding, border security, but yet did write legislation to make sure we start teaching sex education in kindergarten. her priorities are whacked. the people are arizona are turned off by the fact she won't show up for a debate. it's a job interview. the people of arizona are the hiring manager. we're showing up for a job interview. you don't get the job if you don't show up for the interview. she knows that she will get roasted on stage because of her background. >> tucker: i can see why they're trying to silence you. since you're here, i have to

throw this at you, because you live in a border state that's born the brunt of the lawlessness on our border. we just received digital footage of illegal aliens being dropped off. maybe the people make these policies should have to live with them. what's your view of this? >> you know, i actually -- i get a kick out of it, watching the liberal mayors, just throw their hands up and say we can't handle it because it's live every day for us in these border states. however, i'm not a fan of it, tucker. we're taking people illegally, who shouldn't be here, moving them further inland. my plan is the most aggressive plan on the border. we'll secure the border, issue a declaration of invasion on day one, get troops on the border in the form of our national guard, stop people from coming over. we're going to stop the cartels

from having control of our border. i don't like it as a mother. i know no airsia arizonan likes. fentanyl is number one killer of young people, coming through arizona, because joe biden gave control of our border to the cartels. on day we know, would you going to invoke article one, section 10 authority, take control of the border away from the federal government. it's a dereliction of duty what they've done. >> tucker: yes. >> we're not going to let joe biden drag the state of arizona down while he's trying to destroy the country. >> tucker: i can see why they're trying to stop you. kari lake, thank you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: we'll check in with an election in progress in the state of florida. charlie crist is running. was a republican. now he's a democrat. not only a democrat. he has just explained that he might also be the son of god. charlie crist next.

i may be close to retirement but i'm as busy as ever. and thanks to voya, i'm confident about my future. voya provides guidance for the right investments. they make me feel like i've got it all under control. voya. be confident to and through retirement.

every search you make, every click you take, every move you make, every step you take, i'll be watching you. the internet doesn't have to be duckduckgo is a free all in one privacy app with a built in search engine, web browser, one click data clearing and more stop companies like google from watching you, by downloading the app today. duckduckgo: privacy, simplified. >> tucker: john fetterman removed his hoody, and revealed

a large lump. not the only democrat with secrets. charlie crist has a secret. last time he ran for mayor, local media noticed that he insisted having an electric fan with him at all times. he took it to a debate, causing the debate to be canceled. at the time, it was downplayed. "we're just fans. it's not a big deal." here was crist earlier this year. >> have you heard that? think about it. boom. crystal-clear. he's bad. we're good. >> tucker: he's bad. we're good. it's simple. any politician tells you it's simple, he's good, i'm bad, is a false prophet. doesn't answer the question. what's the electric fan doing

there? is it still following charlie crist around? what's the nature of their relationship? was that finish present during this interview? >> where do you stand on vaccine passports an businesses? >> we should have vaccine passports. i think that's important. >> tucker: ha-ha-ha. vaccine apart to get into that? in the background you hear the hum of the fan. no sane person would say this on television. a vaccine passport to get over into georgia from florida? we'll find out what this fan is and get back to you. chicago one of the great cities in the world, worst time in its history. crime up more than 35% this year. the city's mayor, corey lightfoot, refuses to answer questions about it, silencing reporters about it. of the last year she said she wasn't going to talk to white reporters, period, because she's not a racist. no problem, don't worry.

then this july, lightfoot's administration revoked the press credentials of a reporter. lightfoot alleges her security detail was assaulted. >> don't touch me. god willing -- hey, dude, don't touch me. >> i didn't touch you. >> back up. back up. don't touch me. don't touch me. >> tucker: so turns out the only cops in chicago who are doing anything are the ones protecting lori lightfoot, the ones hitting reporters. then you understand why fightfoot wants this guy nowhere her, because this reporter asks real questions. william kelly joins us tonight. >> wonderful to be with you. this is a textbook first amendment case. unfortunately the textbook is from venezuela.

>> tucker: right. are we missing something? your credentials were revoked because you asked the most obvious possible question. our city is falling apart. what are you going to do? no longer allowed. >> exactly right. i believe that journalism is extremely important. i've had a media credential in chicago for over 10 years. emmy award-winning. print, radio, tv. but mayor lightfoot is the least transparent mayor in our city's history. sadly my -- for better or worse, the reason my questions were so effective, because i was asking the questions that real chicagoans wanted to hear, but they were hurting her re-election campaign so she canceled by media credential. the real scandal is mayor lightfoot has 80-pus security guards that protect her from me asking her questions during a re-election campaign at the time when the chicago police are down

1500 officers, crime is out of control. there's a record low arrests. and a spike in police suicides. it's my prayer that a federal judge will restore my media credential tomorrow so i can go back to chicago city hall, ask about the spike in police suicide, which is such a tragedy that's facing our city right now. >> tucker: i mean this is obvious censorship. really quick, have other media organization, "chicago tribune," for example, have they filed complaints with you on your behalf? have you stood with you in solidarity? >> this has a chilling effect on reporters. they see i asked real questions, and got my credential revoked, canceled is a better word. i grew up in chicago watching legendary reporters, chasing politicians up and down the street. right? and this is the tradition i want to uphold.

this is the chicago reporter tradition that lightfoot wants to cancel. >> tucker: yeah. i mean, they'd be ashamed of what's happened to your city and your media. mr. kelly, thank you for coming on tonight. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: it's a tough time for children in our country, up and down, of all ages, including those not born. our next guest said something about it on "dr. phil," which takes some stones. m she joins usus straight ahead. [acoustic soul music throughout] [acoustic soul music throughout] [acoustic soul music throughout] [acoustic soul music throughout]

>> tucker: people used to make fun of, we may have done it ourselves, "dr. phil show," a celebrity freak show, but in 2022, you may find more interesting and honest guests on the show than msnbc. he recently interviewed this

woman. >> you have no empathy. >> abortion is to devastating to a woman's mental health. no one talks about that. the year after a woman has -- >> the trauma is from the rape. the child is an innocent party there. we should not take out generational sin on a child, to say there's generational sin, the dad was an abuser and -- that's not fair to a child. >> a right has been taken away from us. >> i want to address that, because our fundamental human right that we all share in this room is life. it's the first human right. laws are protected to people. who's the weakest in a society? a child. whether you live 10 minutes or 10 years or 100 years, you're a human life, and you have the right not to be killed. >> tucker: an amazing exchange. the nose ring girl is damaged,

deeply mad about something. lila rose stays calm during the whole thing. she joins us. thank you for coming on, showing how you really do win an argument, not by drowning the other person out by rage, shouting them down, but calmly saying what you think. i think you win people when you do that. >> well, thanks, tucker. i mean, i'm fighting and we're fighting for something beautiful, human lives. what's there to be worked up over? it's the evil of abortion. oat the truth sets people free. when we are equipped with the truth to share that, sharing facts about scientific development of human life in the womb, facts about the evil of abortion, the facts speak for themselves. it's a powerful mental that i'm privileged to get to share. >> tucker: you never dismiss, i notice, the suffering of the young woman, or any woman, who's

pregnant and doesn't want to be, but you point out that killing the child hurts the woman too. that's why there's so much rage around this issue. >> i think you're spot on. we're actually about to launch a white paper but also a series of many videos, testimonies of women, who have had abortions, had the courage to speak out about how devastating abortion was to them. the meanta data points out there's serious mental risks. in the year having a abortion, 150 more likely to commit suicide. listen, don't do it. choose life. there are people that want to help you. life is worth fighting for. >> tucker: yeah. if you cared about women, as they say they do at planned parenthood, they would care about that. they don't care about women. they care about more abortions. lila rose, i appreciate you

coming on, and your calmness. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: a pretty big actress in hollywood worked for disney, but then made the mistake of talking about covid. she wasn't political, but they tried to crush her anyway. she's unbowed, and joins us she's unbowed, and joins us next.

after my car accident, she's unwondnder whahatmy c cas. next. so i called the barnes firm. i'm rich barnes. youour cidedentase e woh than insurance offered? call the barnes firm now to find out. yoyou ght t beurprpris want a permanent solution to homelessness? call the barnes firm now to find out. you won't get it with prop 27. it was written and funded by out-of-state corporations

to permanently maximize profits, not homeless funding. 90% of the profits go to out-of-state corporations permanently. only pennies on the dollar for the homeless permanently. and with loopholes, the homeless get even less permanently. prop 27. they didn't write it for the homeless. they wrote it for themselves. when that car hit my motorcycle, they wrote it for themselves. insurance wasn't fair. so i called the barnes firm, it was the best call i could've made.

call the barnes firm now, and find out what your case could be worth. ♪ call one eight hundred, eight million >> tucker: a pretty famous mixed martial artist became an actress, became more successful, and appeared in films like "dead pool" and "fast and furious," on a disney show, but then her career hit a brick wall. why? she was fired because she had opinions on facemasks and the 2021 election. she wasn't particularly political. certainly not a partisan. she crushed her for it. she's unbowed. we sat down with her. pretty amazing interview. here is gina explaining how she responded when disney told her she had to give her pronounce. >> when i wouldn't hashtag trans

rights, put my pronounce in, they kept on pressuring me. finally i said, i'm not doing this. like what are the pronouns? i didn't even know what people were talking about. i was not clued in to the pronounce thing, which apparently that's been happening for, like -- like, seven, eight years now, right? >> tucker: nobody explained the purpose? >> huh-uh. i didn't know. >> you're supposed to know. if you don't know you're a bigot. >> yeah. then i put beep/bop/boot. >> tucker: that means middle finger to you? >> i can put anything in my bio, do whatever i want. >> tucker: because you thought it was a free country? >> i was speaking out about lockdowns, masks, vaccinations, and pronouns way before anybody was, like, saying a word about it. i was a little bit ahead.

i'm sure if i would have done it now, it wouldn't have been a big deal, but because when i was talking about it when nobody else was talking about it, especially nobody else in my industry, lucas films called me, okay, we'll need you to get -- go on a zoom call with 45 of our lgbtq community, get you on the phone with these people, have you watch these trans movies about the trans lives documentaries, and i was, like, okay, i'll watch your documentaries, talk to your people, but i'm not getting on a zoom people with people who can have their phones out and tape me. that's abusive. >> tucker: we've become fascinated by bravery, where it emerges, people you never expect it to emerge in. that's a brave woman. so the unelected governor of new york, speaking of democracy, is

finally standing for election november. lee zelden is running against her, capping up in the polls, because he's talking about things people care about. he's a member of congress, a candidate for the governor of new york. he joins us. thank you very much for coming on. a lot of republicans across the country have decided to talk about things other than crime. why are you talking about it? >> it's the number one issue, the reason why new york leads the entire nation in population losses. people feel like their safety is under attack. their wallets. their freedom. quality of their kids' education. they believe if they go down to places like texas or florida, some of these other places, that their money will go further, they will feel safer, live life freer. that's why new york leads the entire nation in population loss. we're seeing a debate in illinois, other places, about whether or not they should have

cashless bail, and get more das into power who refuse to enforce the law. in new york, they actually have this, the pro-criminal laws already passed. we're seeing the consequences of it. we have the das like alvin bragg refusing to do his job. even lax judges refusing to do theirs, while law enforcement is thrown under the bus. even if you're a democrat, even if you're an independent, we're finding that people who have, for their entire lives, have voted democrat, and they've realized if they want to save their city, new york city, save their state, they need balance and common sense. you need get tough on crime in order to be back in charge of your streets. >> tucker: exactly. kathy hochul cares deeply about safety. she wanted us to wear masks alone in the shower for safety reasons. why isn't she bringing safety to new york streets? >> she's been pandering to the left, whether it's tax and spend

policies, or these pro-criminal policies. she signed a bill named less is more, to release people early from prison who should remain behind bars. tsolitary confinement, not like what you see in the movies, what's happened over the last few months, attacks on correction officers, prison staffs and inmates, have gone up, skyrocketed. hochul's big solution is call them incarcerated individuals. problem solved. people using drugs. maybe we need more legal injection sites. you want to give out more permits for cannabis licenses. they're giving front of line access if you have a prior drug conviction. a lot of new yorkers are scratching their heads, feeling like it's going in the wrong direction. >> tucker: it's the end of

civilization. anyone pushing violent crime. thank you, lee. >> thank you, tucker. >> tucker: we hear that the insurrection that and january 6th is worse than pearl harbor.er is theres anything worse? we'll show you what it is next.

>> insurrection. at it is next. nothing is more dangerous than an insurrection. but that's not true. what's more dangerous than insurrection? joe biden ditching his secret service detail and driving his corvette back to the courwhite house. they almost let that happen today. for real. >> get out of the way, everybody. thi thi thisling -- this thing is live. >> i'm heading to my secret

service taking. i'm driving home. >> he says he's driving home. >> yeah. given what he's done to the country, i think everyone can agree, even mrs. biden, not a good idea for him to drive a motor vehicle. that's it for us tonight. we'll be back tomorrow night 8:00 p.m. have the best night. here's sean hannity. >> sean: that is the corvette go6 that there's a waiting list a mile long. and i'm like at the bottom. that is a great car. and no ecuad-- he should not be driving that car. >> thank you, sean. >> sean: welcome to hannity. tonight dr. fauci confronted tonight. >> also, tonight wisconsin candidate mandela barnes was caught on camera trashing capitalism. this, after he called for violently criminals to b